NAVJOT SINGH - MARKETER, WRITER & EDITOR 雷辛格 - 作者, 市场
  • Home
  • Who am I?
  • 中文
  • Travel & Books
  • Photographs
  • Navjot's Blog
  • Airline PR
  • Portfolio
  • Terms & Conditions

Farnborough Airshow 2022: Highlights

7/25/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
Farnborough Airshow 2022: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
The air show was delayed for two years during the pandemic
This week saw the welcome return of the Farnborough Air Show. Running from 18-22 July, visitors were treated to displays, press releases, panel roundtables, exhibitions from the aviation industry, including aerospace, defense. Issues such as Environmental, Governance and Sustainability (ESG) were high on the agenda, with aircraft manufacturers and airlines promising smarter technology, cleaner fuel, and greener business. This means more room for highly fuel efficient and quieter aircraft, and hopefully less expensive to operate.

As an example, Airbus and CFM International are collaborating to flight test CFM’s cutting-edge open fan engine architecture on board an Airbus A380. The Flight Test Demonstrator is aimed to mature and accelerate the development of advanced propulsion technologies, as part of CFM’s Revolutionary Innovation for Sustainable Engine (RISE) demonstration programme.

“New propulsion technologies will play an important role in achieving aviation’s net-zero objectives, along with new aircraft designs and sustainable energy sources,” said Sabine Klauke, Airbus Chief Technical Officer.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, astronaut Tim Peake, and British Transport Secretary Grant Shapps visited the show in the first two days. The Prime Minister met some of the 1,500 exhibitors at one of the world’s biggest aerospace and defense trade shows. In a speech, Mr Johnson said: "I’m glad that I finally made it to Farnborough, this famous air show, in the climactic weeks of my time as Prime Minister."

The photos in this blog were taken over the five days, in a period in which we experienced the hottest day ever in the history of records in the UK (40.2C) on Tuesday July 19, followed by the obligatory rain showers. Hence why you seen a blue sky in some photos and a dark grey in others.
Picture
Farnborough Airshow 2022: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Were there many orders?

With this being the first show in four years (and with a delay due to the Pandemic), it seemed and came across as a quieter affair compared to previous shows. There wasn't the much anticipated fanfare that happened in previous years. But one thing was clear: Boeing seemed to do quite well in terms of orders. Though Airbus, meanwhile, managed to conduct just two sales on the premises of the airshow, one for the A220 and one for the A321neo. However, it had secured a big win just ahead of Farnborough, with China’s top three carriers ordering almost 300 A320 family aircraft on 1 July, 2022. This chart from AeroTime shows a breakdown of the orders made in this year's show, and Boeing has certainly made more orders in 2022:

The Boeing 737 MAX 10

The largest of the 737 MAX family, the Boeing 737 MAX 10, made its international debut at the Farnborough International Airshow 2022. During the show, the aircraft ran on a blend of sustainable aviation fuel. Before the show, Boeing had already received more than 3,300 net orders for 737 MAX narrow bodies, and kicked off the Farnborough Airshow with firm order signings with Delta Air Lines, Inc. for at least 100 Boeing 737 MAX 10 jets and with All Nippon Airways parent ANA Holdings for twenty 737 MAX 8s, along with two Boeing 777-8F cargo variants.

Also, 
Qatar Airways made official an order for 25 Boeing 737 MAX 10 aircraft, with options for a further 25 of the type. "We are honored that Qatar Airways has decided to add Boeing’s single-aisle family to its fleet, deepening our relationship with this world-class airline," said Stan Deal, President and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes. "The 737 MAX 10 is ideally suited for Qatar Airways’ regional network and will provide the carrier with the most capable, most fuel-efficient airplane in its class," he added. ​The order, worth $3.4 billion at list prices, capped a largely one-sided show dominated by Boeing's efforts to shore up the MAX 10, whose future lies partly in the hands of regulators and Congress.

Qatar Airways displayed its Boeing 777-300ER (FIFA World Cup 2022 Livery), 787-9 Dreamliner and Qatar Executive Gulfstream at the airshow.
Picture
The Boeing 737 MAX 10 at Farnborough. The B737 MAX 10 incorporates the latest technology CFM International LEAP-1B engines, Advanced Technology winglets, Boeing Sky Interior, large flight deck displays, and other improvements to deliver the highest efficiency. Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Stanley A Deal, Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer at Boeing Commercial Airplanes with Akbar Al Baker, Group CEO of Qatar Airways and Secretary-General of Qatar Tourism at the Farnborough Airshow: Photo Copyright Boeing Company

Welcome to the 737 MAX family Delta Air Lines! With today’s order for up to 130 737-10s you join a growing list of airlines operating the largest member of the 737 MAX family helping to drive efficiencies & support sustainability goals.

Release: https://t.co/3MoVEMv2cS#FIA2022 pic.twitter.com/woJhq10xIY

— Boeing Airplanes (@BoeingAirplanes) July 18, 2022
Picture
The Boeing 737 MAX 10 at Farnborough. Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
The Boeing 737 MAX 10 winglet is the most efficient winglet on any airplane: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Up and away! ✈️

The newest and largest addition to our 737 MAX family, the 737-10, takes to the sky for its first flying demonstration at #FIA2022. pic.twitter.com/FU6jjmTkLq

— Boeing Airplanes (@BoeingAirplanes) July 18, 2022
Picture
The Boeing 737 MAX 10 leaves Farnborough after the show back to Seattle via Reykjavik. The 737 MAX 10 will continue test flights and obtain its type certificate before it can begin scheduled operations. The delay, caused by the problems of the 737 MAX 8 and the extended scrutiny of the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), is a major stumbling block in its commercialization. Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

The Boeing 777X

One of the highlights of 2022’s edition of the show was the huge Boeing 777X, the world’s largest and most efficient twin-engine jet, which the manufacturer showed off in both static and flying displays. With new breakthroughs in aerodynamics and engines, the 777X will deliver 10 percent lower fuel use and emissions and 10 percent lower operating costs than the competition. The 777X is based on the original 777, but is much larger, more powerful, and is ready to serve the next generation of long-haul air travel, and generally passengers prefer large aircraft, and this will not disappoint!

Even though the 777X has been delayed by over five years, we are in this interesting period where the airlines that were affected by the delay have almost got over that part now. The COVID-19 Pandemic, if anything, has helped that cause. With any new aircraft, airlines are usually cautious. It is going to be great for the passengers and great for the airlines, too!
Picture
With the wingtips extended, the 777X has a wingspan of 71.75 meters (235 feet and 5 inches). On the ground and when the wingtips are folded, the aircraft has a wingspan of 64.82m (212’ 8”): Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
So far 8 customers have confirmed orders for the Boeing 777X: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
The Boeing 777X during a display at the Farnborough 2022 Airshow: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Warm champagne anyone?

The show also saw the introduction of some interesting features that we may see. Thanks to the team at Turningleftforless for taking this video of a "Champagne on Demand" as demonstrated by  ​Adient collaborating with Boeing to explore improved comfort, functionality of commercial aircraft seating and interiors. My mate, James Nixon (ex- A380 captain), queried "Why does any airline exec think passengers want to drink warm champagne?".

I need to fly like this all the time. Champagne on demand □□□ #FarnboroughAirShow at @BoeingUK pic.twitter.com/FI1W7mDLhU

— Turningleftforless (@turningleftfor) July 18, 2022

Airbus A350-900 XWB and the Airbus A220-300

Airbus brought its A350 test aircraft for display flights throughout the show. Also, Airbus showcased an ITA Airways A350-900 and an Air Baltic A220-300 aircraft on the ground.
Picture
Airbus A350-900 XWB displaying at Farnborough: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Airbus A350-900 XWB displaying at Farnborough: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Airbus A350-900 XWB displaying at Farnborough: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Italy's ITA Airways showcased their brand new Airbus A350-900 XWB, registered EI-IFF: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Italy's ITA Airways showcased their brand new Airbus A350-900 XWB, registered EI-IFF: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Italy's ITA Airways showcased their brand new Airbus A350-900 XWB, registered EI-IFF: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Picture
Italy's A350-900 and Air Baltic's A220: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
The APU of Italy's ITA Airways brand new Airbus A350-900 XWB, registered EI-IFF: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Italy's ITA Airways showcased their brand new Airbus A350-900 XWB, registered EI-IFF: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Air Baltic's A220. One of the biggest orders for the aircraft came from Delta Air Lines, Inc. Delta Air Lines firmed up orders for 12 A220-300 aircraft, bringing Delta’s total firm order for A220s to 107 aircraft – 45 A220-100s and 62 A220-300s. The A220s will be powered by Pratt & Whitney GTF™ engines. Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

New British Airline: Hans Airways

Picture
​Start-up carrier Hans Airways moved a step closer to launching flights between the UK and India, with the lease of an A330-200 aircraft and the start of crew training. According to the CEO, Satnam S. Saini, the aircraft is weeks away from launch.

The airline plans to launch flights between Birmingham airport and Amritsar as a key destination using an ex-Air Europa A330 and with a two class configuration – economy (branded Anand Class) with 274 seats and a seat pitch of 31 inches, and premium economy (Anand Plus) with 24 seats and a seat pitch of 56 inches.

Updating the media on progress Barry Humphries, CBE, Hans Airways’ board director and former head of air services policy at the UK Civil Aviation Authority, said:

“With the loss of flights operated by India’s Jet Airways and British inclusive tour operators Thomas Cook and Monarch Airlines, there is room for a third UK airline flying between UK and India (complementing British Airways and Virgin Atlantic.) All of us are working exceptionally hard and on schedule to be that third UK designated carrier.”

Supernal's eVTOL vehicle cabin

Picture
Supernal's eVTOL vehicle cabin concept was on display at the Farnborough International Airshow, and provided the first look at how Hyundai Motor Group (the Group) is integrating automotive capabilities to develop the Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) market. Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Black Eagles and the ​Boeing Stearman (Aerosuperbatics Wingwalkers)

Picture
South Korean Air Force's finest - the Black Eagles: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Boeing Stearman (Aerosuperbatics Wingwalkers): Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Future is Boom?

Boom Supersonic announced the updated design of Overture with 4 engines. Carrying 65–80 passengers at twice the speed of today’s airliners, Overture will fly Mach 1.7 over water with a range of 4,250 nautical miles.
​
Boom further said that the new design is the culmination of 26 million core hours of simulated software designs, five wind tunnel tests, and the careful evaluation of 51 full design iterations resulting in an economically and environmentally sustainable supersonic airliner. Boom also announced a market-expanding alliance with Northrop Grumman to develop special mission variants for the U.S. Government and its allies. ​

The question here is, will it better what Concorde achieved and will passengers pay for and enjoy the experience? United Airlines have already proudly stated that they plan to offer services on Boom. But will it be a success? We shall see. Maybe a debut at future Farnborough Airshows?
Picture
Boom Supersonic during a demo video at Farnborough: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Aircraft on display

Picture
USAF CH-47 Chinook at the Farnborough Airshow 2022: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
USAF CH-47 Chinook at the Farnborough Airshow 2022: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
USAF's finest: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
This view could easily be confused with a US military base: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
F-15E Strike Eagles: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
USAF P-5A - a 737 converted for military usage: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Stuck inside the S-70M Black Hawk!: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
RAF Westland Sea King: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
0 Comments

The Landor, Boeing 747-400 Experience Day

6/26/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
G-BNLY parked at Dunsfold Aerodrome: Copyright Navjot Singh
My daughter and I were fortunate enough to spend around four hours touring the "Landor" livery Boeing 747-400, G-BNLY, belonging to British Airways on the Experience Day, 26th of June, 2021. 

No parts of the aircraft were out of bounds, so although subject to strict numbers on board at any time to comply with COVID and safety regulations, it was great to get the chance to see everything close up. This was a rare chance to get close and personal with the 'Queen of the Skies' (or any aircraft for that matter) because if you want to take photos of aircraft at airports, then it is usually all rushed and not an enjoyable experience (especially for us aviation enthusiasts, and even airline crew after 9/11 are banned from taking photos with some airlines.). 

We boarded adjacent to the Club World cabin, and we then see Club World and the World Traveller cabins, going towards the back of the aircraft. It was an added bonus to get to go up the ladder into the crew rest area, right at the back of the aircraft! With the aircraft being in storage since March 2020, and with limited amount of air conditioning or refurbishment/cleaning of the seats etc., so there was a slight pungent smell inside the cabin (similar to something you may have in a stuffy garage on a hot day.). But, never the less, the experience was priceless. 

Then back to the main door and up the stairs to the upper deck - and a walk through to the Cockpit. Though we were not allowed to sit in the cockpit seats because the aircraft is still technically 'active' (i.e. it can be taxied and towed to other parts of the aerodrome etc., and also for insurance purposes.), it was still an amazing and rare experience to be able to spend quality time without being rushed (as you usually are when flying.).

There was also a chance to do a walkaround and get close to the under belly as well as the undercarriage bays - parts that passengers never get to see up close. This experience day was only open to the public for one day, and so this may be the last time I may get to be close to a 747 ever. You rarely see a 747 these days at airports (except for the occasional cargo aircraft, and even they are becoming rare.). So this was a very special day indeed and one that will go down in history. 

It was a great experience - and I hope these photos provide some insights and maybe even bring back lovely memories for some!
Picture
The tailfin of the Boeing 747-400 is height of 63 ft 6 in (19.35 m) and only when you get close to it the sheer size hits you: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
A 747 has five turbine engines! Hiding inside the tail (shown here) is an extra engine called an Auxiliary Power Unit (APU). During on-ground operation, it provides bleed air for cabin conditioning from a low spool-driven load compressor, and electrical power from two gearbox-mounted 90kVA generators: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
G-BNLY parked at Dunsfold Aerodrome: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Boeing 747-400 G-BNLY at Dunsfold Aerodrome: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Up, close, and personal. The Boeing 747-400 has four engines, and British Airways chose the Rolls-Royce RB211 engine. Each engine is capable of generating 41,030 to 59,450 lbf of thrust.: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Human vs machine: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
G-BNLY British Airways 747-400: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Posing in front of the "Queen of the Skies": Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Well travelled tyres: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Boeing 747-400 Yoke Stick - Captain's side: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Cockpit of G-BNLY: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
G-BNLY cockpit central console: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
G-BNLY British Airways at Dunsfold: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
G-BNLY at Dunsfold: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
0 Comments

Departure from Langkawi

2/14/2017

 
Picture
Captured the moment...on the way to Kuala Lumpur on the Boeing 737-800NG with Malaysia Airlines: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Rushing from Beijing to Yangzhou on Air China

1/29/2017

 
Airline pilots are apparently trained not to spill drinks while in-flight. Interestingly, after our flight was delayed by nearly three hours (they like to avoid the insurance claims, so the delays are always just below three hours!), these chaps were in such a rush to get me to my wedding in Yangzhou that we ended up spilling the drinks in-flight!
Picture
There goes the orange juice!: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Yangzhou Airport: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
The Boeing 737-800 on which we travelled: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Goodbye London (again!)

11/11/2016

 
Time to go back to Shanghai (via Hong Kong)...def will beat DHL to get my parcel to the British Embassy- as that would have taken 3 days...quickest turnaround...12 hours of running around London getting errands done (including a quickfire shopping trip to Harrods) and 8 hours of bliss sleep thanks to a great book by James (read his book...perfect for long-haul flights and short stopovers!). Ciao London...
Picture

Emirates Airline EK521, Boeing 777-300 Crash - Official Report

9/7/2016

 
Picture
​On 3 August 2016, a Boeing 777-300 aircraft, registration A6-EMW, belonging to Emirates Airline, was operating a scheduled passenger flight, numbered EK521, and departed Trivandrum International Airport (VOTV), India at 0506am local time for Dubai International Airport (OMDB), the United Arab Emirates (UAE). At approximately 0837am local time, the aircraft impacted the runway during an attempted go-around at Dubai. There were a total of 300 people on-board the aircraft, comprising of 282 passengers, two flight crew members, and 16 cabin crew members. However, the UAE's General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA) was very sad to announce that one of the firefighters lost his life while saving the lives of the others.

Jassim Isa Al Balushi managed to rescue 300 lives, but in doing so, he lost his own. The brave firefighter sustained fatal injuries after helping put out the flames during rescue operations, the report said. His valiant efforts, however, were not in vain, as everyone on board escaped from the burning jet alive—including 282 fliers and 12 cabin staff. Once everyone evacuated, the aircraft exploded and burst into flames and Al Balushi was unfortunately caught in the blaze.

The initial report into the incident has shown the pilot had tried to abandon the landing after the main wheels of the Boeing 777-300 had already touched down.

When such accidents happen, it is always best to wait for the investigators to do their job and publish the report, rather than listen to so many so-called 'aviation experts' on the TV and the internet because most of them are just guessing and have little or no idea on what the truth of the matter is.

The official Preliminary Report has been published by the GCAA of the UAE. Click here to get it from their official website.
Picture
The wreckage of flight EK521 at Dubai airport after the crash: Photo Copyright Reuters
Picture
The wreckage of flight EK521 at Dubai airport after the crash: Photo Copyright Reuters
Picture
The wreckage of flight EK521 at Dubai airport after the crash. A sad photo that also illustrates the reason why you should NEVER wait to take your belongings from an aircraft in case of an emergency...just GET UP, and JUMP DOWN THE EMERGENCY CHUTE!: Photo Copyright Reuters
Picture
An illustration from the GCAA report
Picture
Jasim Issa Mohammed Hassan gave up his own life to save 300 others. Screen grab from @khaleejtimes/Twitter.

Rush Hour at London Heathrow

10/6/2015

 
Picture
Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Aerial Views of Muscat, Oman

9/26/2015

 
Picture
Al Alam Palace, Zazirat Masqat, Takia Area: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Bayt Al Falaj and Darsait Alwa: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Royal Office in Muscat, Oman: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque and the Royal Court Affairs: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque and the Royal Court Affairs: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Oman Armed Forces Club, Muscat: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Island off Oman: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Cabin of this 737-800NG belonging to Oman Air - flying from Kathmandu to Muscat. Oman Air is a boutique five-star airline based in Muscat: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
The beautiful colour scheme of Oman Air (this a Boeing 737-800NG): Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Off to Kathmandu with Malaysia Airlines

9/22/2015

 
Picture
A Malaysia Airlines B777-200 parked at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA). Memories of the two Boeing 777-200 aircraft belonging to Malaysia Airlines that were involved in accidents in 2014 (MH17 and MH370) are still fresh in mind, and every time I see a Boeing 777 belonging to Malaysia Airlines, the events surrounding the unfortunate circumstances of both accidents immediately come to mind. Am I scared to fly with Malaysia Airlines because of those events? No, I am not, and neither should anyone else be afraid to fly with a fine airline as Malaysia Airlines. I firmly believe that those crew on flights MH17 and MH370 were fine people doing their job to take passengers safely in comfort from one place to another, but sadly due to unfortunate events that were out of their control, they perished. Millions of passengers fly around the world, and flying is still one of the safest ways to fly. Let us not forget that Malaysia Airlines is one of the best airlines in the world- it is one of the great legacy carriers. In 2008, I fondly remember having a conversation with Martin Barrow (former MAS Executive Director) in his London office where he invited me to try and experience flying Malaysia Airlines. "Navjot, try Malaysia Airlines and review them. Winner of the Best Cabin Crew awards for many years", said Mr. Barrow in 2008. Ever since that day, I have always wanted to fly with Malaysia Airlines, but could not do so. Thankfully, that day arrived in August (yes, in August, I have been busy all this time so did not have time to update my blog). I am proud to say I flew Malaysia Airlines from Kuala Lumpur to Kathmandu on a Boeing 737-800 (I will write a full review later).
Picture
The very professional and friendly crew of Malaysia Airlines flight MH170 from Kuala Lumpur to Kathmandu in August. All power to them and their colleagues for having the courage and professionalism to continue to doing such as wonderful job after their company suffered such tragic events in the past two years. They say that in the airline industry, an airline is finished if it suffers two or more accidents. However, I do believe Malaysia Airlines will once again be the Skytrax 5-star airline that it used to be. From my experience, their cabin crew and in-flight service is among the best and up there with the top airlines in the world (and for those who may be wondering - no, I am not being paid to write this.): Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture

Old Saudia Boeing 747-200 Parked at Kuala Lumpur International Airport

9/16/2015

 
Picture
Kuala Lumpur means muddy confluence, perhaps because it gets it's fair share of rain. The 13th busiest in the world always seems to be empty, unlike JFK which at 19th busiest always appears to be more busy than it should be (or can handle). It's built about 50kms from the city, about an hour's ride by taxi, and is surrounded by forest because the former prime minsiter wanted to create the illusion that the airport is in the middle of the forest (which it is), and would pave way for other airports to be environmentally friendly - away from the city centre to reduce noise etc. The Kuala Lumpur Grand Prix track is located nearby.

Forests mean green, and green means hot...it gets very hot and humid here - almost into the 90 percent humidity as well as into the 40 degrees Celsius. During approach, planes have to contend with turbulence due to the localised hot air rising from the canopy (whcih we experienced on our way from Hong Kong).

The Power and the Glory

7/26/2015

 
Picture
Nothing beats the beauty of a Boeing 747 staring straight at your face- nothing. China Airlines (of Taiwan) pushes back at Shenzhen: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

She Never Fails to Impress

2/24/2015

 
Picture
'The Queen of the Skies'- Up, Close and Personal at Hong Kong: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
'The Queen of the Skies'- Up, Close and Personal at Hong Kong: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Sunrise over India

2/23/2015

 
Picture
Sunrise over India...flying over Ahmedabad with a Qatar Airways Boeing 777 keeping us company in the Indian skies (we are at 41,000ft flying to HKG, and they were flying to Shanghai Pudong)....this is the closest I'm going to get to India for a long time (until I get my hands on a Visa!!): Photo Copyright Navjot SIngh
Picture
Qatar Airways B777-200 over the skies of India: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Spectacular sunrise over India: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Remove Before Flight!

10/4/2014

 
Picture
Aircraft Dispatch Engineers at Hong Kong Chep Lap Kok Airport: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
The Aircraft Dispatch Engineer (left hand side), stands level with the flight deck side window, but clear of the spinning engines' intakes (don’t want to get sucked in!), and holds up the nose gear steering pin for the benefit of the pilots to see before waving goodbye. He is not saying “Chocks away, chaps!”, but the meaning is something on similar lines. Attached to the pin is a long red tape with the words 'Remove Before Flight' written in large white letters. The pin is necessary to prevent un-commanded movement of the nose wheels during the pushback phase from the aircraft stand. If the pin is not removed then the gear will not retract, which, in the past, has resulted in embarrassment for pilots in a number of airlines (you can Google it!). It means dumping enough fuel to prevent an overweight landing, then returning to land. This can cost an airline millions of dollars (US), cause unnecessary delays, cause extra stress/pressure to the pilots and make a lot of passengers unhappy and worried- none of which any airline or pilot wants.  Aircraft can usually take-off with a much greater weight than they can comfortably land. So, for example the Airbus A380 (and I believe the Boeing 787, too) can always land at its maximum take-off weight in an emergency, but it’s very stressful on the brakes and hence can cause tyre bursts.

Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370

3/30/2014

 
Picture
Like the rest of the world, I first heard about the Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 tragedy on the morning of the 8th of March. A simple message on my phone from a friend who lives in Shenzhen appeared: 'a Malaysia Airlines plane en-route to PEK is presumed crashed with 239 people on-board'. I was shocked (and still am shocked). The flight was code-shared with China Southern Airlines as CZ748. I could have been on that plane had I taken that route to Beijing. It could have been anyone of us. I frantically started browsing through the various news channels to get more updates. There was nothing any of the news updates could report except that a plane was lost...it was totally bewildering. To not get a word out was very disconcerting and unusual (and still is)…'How could a sophisticated and modern Boeing 777-200 aircraft at 35,000 feet get lost around an hour after take-off in this modern-tech age?' The plane's radar transponder (which provides a ‘squawk code’ that enables ATC to track it’s movements on radar), and VHF radio link were mysteriously disabled around an hour after take-off and no one knew where the plane was or where it was heading.

Since that day, the world's attention has been focused with great interest on this lost plane and its 239 passengers and crew (12 crew members and 227 passengers from 15 nations and regions; the majority of passengers were Chinese citizens). One probably cannot even imagine the horror that the relatives and families of those on-board the aircraft are going through. I do believe that the media has been too intrusive and sometimes have gone over the top when focusing on the families. Being a journalist I know very well that photographers may have to get pictures of the grieving families to please their editors, as those pictures earn them their bread and butter (sadly..), however I don't want to or have to look at them. Not only is it bad taste, but also disrespectful and wrong in my opinion. I believe that in some media reports it was confirmed that family members even scuffled with the media scrum, asking them to stop taking photos of grieving relatives.  

We are now led to believe that it has apparently crashed in the far reaches of the southern Indian Ocean. However, that being said, this case is still a mystery...and the truth, when we finally find and recover the wreckage (I believe they will), will be even more surprising and shocking as some of the theories that have been put forward.

There have been many theories relating to the plane’s disappearance, some of them perfectly valid, and some of them completely absurd and unbelievable. For three weeks, friends and relatives of those on-board have been hoping for news - any news- of the wreckage of the plane- but nothing so far has come out. This has understandably caused a sheer amount of frustration, anger, and complete mistrust with the airline and the Malaysian government by the relatives of those on-board this ill-fated flight.

Theories…Theories…And Yet More Theories (but no solid facts)

Whenever there is a situation like this involving a plane crash (or presumed plane crash etc), I tend not to watch the TV news reports too much because there are too many conflicting arguments to and fro, and without being disrespectful to anyone I can say that there are far too many ‘aviation experts’ and journalists alike all proposing their own theories. Second-guessing and speculation does no good and is of no value to nobody. I don't believe in conspiracy theories because they make little sense. It is better to wait until either the wreckage of the aircraft is found - which has not happened at the time of writing this blog. 

Again, no offense intended to anyone, but you just wonder how on earth did some of these journalists become 'aviation experts' when some of them cannot even distinguish an aircraft type and they conjure up their own theories? Who gave them that title? It doesn't look good...and with all due respect even some airline pilots would not call themselves 'aviation experts'...they may be very good travel journalists who have reviewed luxury hotels, airlines etc....but lets not promote them or brand them as being an 'aviation expert'. I am not an aviation expert...that honorable title should be given to someone with a serious amount of technical knowledge about aviation, such as, for example, Flight Global's safety expert David Learmount and independent aviation expert Chris Yates. Both of them are highly admired within the industry. Then there are plenty of aviation experts at Boeing, Airbus, NASA etc. 

Some of the theories that have been mentioned by many experts include: 1. Uncontrollable fire on-board or decompression of the aircraft cabin, 2. A bomb, 3. Pilot suicide, 4. Accidental shoot down, 5. Over speed, manual recovery stuff-up, stall, loss of complete control. 6. Midair collision, 7. Hijacking

Theories 1 and 5. could be plausible as 95% of crashes happen around 8 nautical miles either side of the airport below 3,000 feet and around 95% of aircraft fires happen in the first TWO hours of a flight (these are facts proven and well-known in the aviation industry). Airline pilots are rigorously trained during every simulator check (every 6 months) to realize quickly that the fire is uncontrollable, and then dive for the ground as quickly as possible before the wing burns through and find the nearest airport to land at (if possible)- all under 20 minutes. However, ditching any plane in the dark (this plane disappeared at around 01:20am) is not easy, and especially when you are flying at around 300 kph.

In the initial stages of the investigation, the only real evidence available to the public was the visual observation from an oil rig worker, a New Zealander called Mike McKay. He noted in his e-mail report (which was issued publicly as shown below), that he saw flames start, and go out, at altitude near where the Vietnamese radar trace concluded. An experienced Captain I know commented that his initial reactions upon reading this report ‘led him to assume a wing separation because of over-stressing of the airframe in an apparent recovery attempt from a stall and then an eventual uncontrollable spin straight into the sea.’ That particular Captain went on to say: ‘I figured the lack of debris due to the aircraft going straight-in, and compressing the 777 to the size of a bus.’ Nobody has publicly discounted Mr. McKay’s report, and there has been no proof so far…but yet more anguish and frustration for the families and relatives of the ones on-board the aircraft.

There were also many reports about the aircraft being picked-up on radar west of the Malay Peninsula. Nevertheless, the Chief of Royal Malaysian Air Force in a media statement rejected these unconfirmed reports on the 11th March (please see below)* 

It is difficult to believe theories 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7. This is because there is no proof of any such bomb, and no terrorist group from anywhere has claimed responsibility or any demand for ransom for hijacking (from past cases we have seen that terrorists and hijackers usually cannot help taking responsibility…). 

Initially there were suspicions of terrorism or hijacking based on reports that two Iranian passengers boarded the flight with fake passports; however, it was eventually revealed that they were just after a better life in Europe. There would have been a clear demand from someone if this plane was held on ransom. A recent example of this was displayed on the 17th February earlier this year when an Ethiopian Airlines Boeing 767 was hijacked by it's own First Officer and flown to Geneva. The hijacker, identified by officials as First Officer Hailemedehin Abera Tagegn, waited for his Captain to go to the toilet before locking himself in the cockpit. As with all hijacking events in history, we saw that the hijacker did contact someone to demand something- asylum in this case. However, in the case of Malaysia Airlines MH370 nobody contacted anyone.

Having spoken to some airline pilots, and listened to their theories from experience, I am led to understand that it may have been a fire on-board (smoke kills within a few minutes….quicker than we all think...and especially at high altitude). At some point, after its crew and passengers surrendered and become incapacitated by smoke, the aircraft would have been flying all by itself, and would have eventually gone down into the Indian Ocean once it ran out of fuel.

If the plane was in the cruise on auto-pilot for so many hours without human intervention (as people claim now)...can we say that it's a miracle that it did not collide with another aircraft?...shockingly sad, utterly heartbreaking and scary to think that a 'ghost' plane was flying in the sky with incapacitated people on board...terrible. The answer from a highly experienced Captain with over 28 years flying service was: ‘The sky is enormous, you'd be hard pressed to hit another aircraft…even if you tried it would not work….’

However, the investigation and interrogation by the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) and Inmarsat plc, the British satellite telecommunications company, has been verified and accepted. The investigators from that company now confirm a Southern Indian Ocean trajectory and loss of signal. We have to respect that they have enough information to make that call. At this point in time, you can’t help but wonder why they (the investigators) did not dispatch a couple of long-range reconnaissance aircraft, that could have photographed the whole hemisphere by now, from over 50-60,000 feet, and with minute detail.

Inmarsat sell auxiliary satellite bandwidth to airlines and shipping companies (passenger and freight), so they can provide constant movement connectivity anywhere on Earth. According to the company, around 90% of the world's wide-bodied jets come installed with Inmarsat antennas built in to the fuselage – whether or not the airline operating the plane ultimately uses it. Now, even though Malaysia Airlines did not use it for technical data transmission, nevertheless, the technology has been tremendously useful in the search operation. For the search teams’ time and the treacherous weather in the Indian Ocean are their biggest enemies at the moment because the battery of the ‘pinger’ from the aircraft’s black box is going to stop sending out signals soon.

As well as the relatives of those who were on flight MH370, thoughts are also with the searchers. There's a LOT of ocean to cover (much of it the deepest in the world, and undiscovered so far), and every one of those searches are doing the best they can. The air and sea search efforts have been shifting throughout this case, and have recently shifted yet again as fresh radar data suggested the aircraft headed south faster than initially thought, bringing the plane down some 1,100 kilometres north-east of the previous search area, putting the crash point 1,800 kilometers off Perth, Australia. One thing is for sure, this investigation also reveals the large amount of rubbish that is lurking around in our oceans (!).

It could have been accidentally shot-down by either the Malaysians or the Vietnamese…however, who would want to practice firing missiles at 2 a.m.?!; and when it seems that hardly anyone of the Military installations actually noticed the aircraft? Unless there are some issues that have not been monitored with the mental pilots health, no sane commercial airline pilot carrying passengers would even think of entering another country’s airspace - especially knowing that they have a military Air Force - without permission. You can bet your bottom dollar that the minute a civilian (or military) aircraft enters another country’s airspace without permission, then a bunch of air force fighter jets would be scrambled to get close and personal within minutes!

In regards to reports that some villagers in the Maldives saw a plane flying low doesn't sound plausible to me. No offense but anything bigger than a seaplane would seem 'big' to the people there because most of them have probably never seen a plane of that size. Anybody...and I mean ANYBODY...who has seen the only airport in the Maldives (i.e. Male Airport) large enough to take a Boeing 777 knows that you can't hide a plane of that size anywhere on that place. The airport, just like the islands around it, is TINY...the 777 would stick out like a sore thumb! 

The plane would not be able to hide anywhere, even on a remote airfield. Why? Because it would have to go over land masses and it would easily have been captured on primary radar operated by the military. As I mentioned above that nobody can enter another country's airspace without being detected by the air defense zone radars.

It could have been pilot suicide. However, all the commercial pilots I have spoken to have told me that it is highly unlikely that the pilot would have committed suicide. In the entire history of commercial aviation, only 4 airline pilots have been documented to have committed suicide during flight…this includes: Silk Air 185, Egyptair 990, LAM Mozambique 470, and Royal Air Maroc 630. It’s a very privileged career where individuals spend hundreds of thousands of dollars and many years to get trained, and are being regularly examined every 3-6 months for simulator training, in-flight checks, and health checks. It must take a very mentally disturbed and sick individual to take his and others lives with him on a plane. 

No sane pilot wants to die or kill anyone..or even think of such idiotic things. Pilots have the moral duty of taking ownership and responsibility to save lives FIRST before anything in an emergency- safety is everything in aviation. Unless there is concrete evidence that this pilot committed suicide, it's a very difficult theory to accept and swallow. 

The Boeing 777 aircraft has an exceedingly impressive safety record – the first fatal crash in its 19-year history only came in July 2013, when an Asiana Airlines (read about it here) aircraft crash landed short of the runway at San Francisco International Airport. Three of the 307 people aboard died. Besides the Asiana Airlines crash, the only other serious incident with the Boeing 777 came in January 2008 when a British Airways B777-200 landed short of the southern runway at London’s Heathrow airport without any serious casualties.

Brand Malaysia Airlines Damaged?

As the saying goes in PR that ‘any publicity, is good publicity’…however there is question in this case when it comes to a sad and tragic event like this. 'If you love life, don't fly with Malaysia Airlines!!' shouted one relative of a passenger on ‪#‎MH370 as the Malaysian PM gave the news conference...at that point you would have thought that the Airline and the Government had shot themselves in their own foot (the above quote taken from twitter). 

According to a friend who flies the Airbus A330, there is a saying in the aviation industry that if an airline is on the front pages for more than TWO weeks, then it's bound for failure. If that statement is true then Malaysia Airlines may be history. However, I think that the airline may survive this bad episode because: 1. It's the national flag carrier of Malaysia, and 2. Malaysia Airlines is strongly financially backed by the Malaysian government and Penerbangan Malaysia Berhad. The airline may be struggling (it has been some time), however I am optimistic that Malaysia Airlines will eventually bounce back in the future. They may initially reduce the fares and go for a heavily tempting PR campaign to increase interest, OR the worst-case scenario may be that it could be taken into the hands of a low-cost carrier, such as Tony Fernandes’ Air Asia (though the latter statement may not be plausible).

Bear in mind that national flag carriers have gone bust in the past (Olympic Airways, Sabena Belgian Airlines, Swiss Air (before it was re-branded), VIASA Venezuelan Airlines, VARIG Brazilian, Balkan Bulgarian, MALEV Hungarian and many others), however it must be noted that these airlines were not provided strong financial support by their own financially struggling governments. It must also be noted that some major airlines have gone bust after experiencing disasters. Prime examples include Pan Am (after the Lockerbie disaster), TWA 800, and Swiss 111. However, in these respects, Malaysia Airlines is fortunate to have solid support from their government.

I firmly believe that until any concrete evidence has been presented, then those Malaysia Airlines crew and passengers should be hailed as heroes for trying to save the plane from disaster, but were unable to do so for whatever reason (fire…most likely considering what’s been presented). It’s not good of the tabloid newspaper editors for writing articles that may be deemed untrue and certainly not good to mislead their readers without any facts or proof.

While the families are understandably upset with the airline and the Malaysian government, it must be noted that the airline is just an observer that is passing the information from the investigators to the public. And in this case we have investigators and search teams from around 25 countries, so therefore the ability to communicate effectively and coordinate together as ONE team in a smooth fashion is absolutely crucial. There is not much an airline can do once an investigation starts except keep the media and families of the crew and passengers informed , and therefore it is obviously causing friction because the public are not getting much information from the airline or the government. The airline’s role and credibility is measured by how they treat the families, and how they handle the media. The one good thing this has revealed is the frightfully negligent way we have approved airplane safety, particularly design of black box.

Without any doubt whatsoever, we have seen ourselves on the TV screens in the past three weeks that the airline has mishandled the media (and vice-versa), and that comes across bad from any PR prospect. It just shows that the airline may have not been prepared for such an event. Perhaps this would be an excellent learning curve for all other airlines around the world too. They key word here is ‘investigation’- and so the airline cannot really do much except wait for the investigators to complete their job. When an aviation disaster happens, the airline and the management team of the airline are mere observers, and wait for what the investigators come out with.

The airline has no doubt one of the best in-flight products in the industry. I fondly recall the words of Mr. Martin Barrow -former non-executive director of Malaysia Airlines- inviting me some years ago to try their product: 'Why don't you try MAS, Navjot? Best cabin crew in the world'. Nevertheless, far fetched from reality, the airline is going through some tough times indeed. 

A week ago when the families vented their angry and frustration during one of the chaotic press conferences, the only words I could think of were: complete madness...completely diabolical...too many 'aviation experts/cooks' in the kitchen...too much clutter/confusion...too much media intrusion around the grieving families...too many theories. We can only hope that the relatives will have some news soon on what exactly happened to their loved ones in their final moments. The one good thing this event revealed is the frightfully negligent way we have approved airplane safety, particularly the design of the black box.

It's a mystery that not one piece of the plane has been found. It's a truly amazing situation the aviation industry has found themselves in - though I do believe that it may take time before we find something. When people point to the size of the aircraft, the answer to that is simple: the aircraft is not big at all. In fact it's probably the size of one bottle cap in a large sea. If it went straight into the ocean then it would have turned immediately into a metal box perhaps the size of a small bus...especially if it went in nose first, at speed...and everything else would have sadly been either vaporised or turned into minute shrapnel pieces. 

Until concrete evidence is presented, I, like many others, believe that we should not label the crew on that plane as terrorists, suicidal, or anything else negative...but as heroes who were frantically trying to get the plane safely back on the ground but could not do so. 

_______________________________________________________________________________

* a version of this article also appeared on the Huffington Post blog: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/navjot-singh/post_7222_b_5056524.html

My sincere thanks to my friends and colleagues, many of whom are professionals in the aviation industry and are touched by this case, and who contributed with their thoughts to this article. - Navjot Singh
Picture
A Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-2H6/ER seen climbing out after departure from Vienna Airport- the aircraft that has gone missing is similar to this: Photo Copyright Thierry Deutsch
Picture
Visual observation from a New Zealand Oil Rig Worker called Mike McKay: Photo Copyright ABC’s Bob Woodruff
*The Royal Malaysia Air Force has rejected the media reports that it tracked the Boeing 777 after it turned west in a statement posted on its Facebook page and reproduced in full below.

(This statement could be read as confirming the substance of the reports, that the RMAF did in fact follow MH370 as reported.)

OFFICIAL STATEMENT BY CHIEF OF ROYAL MALAYSIAN AIR FORCE ON BERITA HARIAN NEWS ARTICLE DATED 11th MARCH 2014 ON SEARCH AND RESCUE OPERATIONS IN THE STRAITS OF MALACCA

1. I refer to the Berita Harian news article dated 11th March 2014 on Search and Rescue Operations in the Straits of Malacca which (in Bahasa Malaysia) referred to me as making the following statements: The RMAF Chief confirmed that RMAF Butterworth airbase detected the location signal of the airliner as indicating that it turned back from its original heading to the direction of Kota Bahru, Kelantan, and was believed to have pass through the airspace of the East Coast of and Northern Peninsular Malaysia. The last time the plane was detected by the air control tower was in the vicinity of Pulau Perak in the Straits of Malacca at 2.40 in the morning before the signal disappeared without any trace, he said.

2. I wish to state that I did not make any such statements as above, what occurred was that the Berita Harian journalist asked me if such an incident occurred as detailed in their story, however I did not give any answer to the question, instead what I said to the journalist was “Please refer to the statement which I have already made on 9 March 2014, during the press conference with the Chief of Defence Force at the Sama-Sama Hotel, Kuala Lumpur International Airport”.

3. What I stated during that press conference was, The RMAF has not ruled out the possibility of an air turn back on a reciprocal heading before the aircraft vanished from the radar and this resulted in the Search and Rescue Operations being widen to the vicinity of the waters of Pulau Pinang.

4. I request this misreporting be amended and corrected to prevent further misinterpretations of what is clearly an inaccurate and incorrect report.

5. Currently the RMAF is examining and analyzing all possibilities as regards to the airliner’s flight paths subsequent to its disappearance. However, for the time being, it would not be appropriate for the RMAF to issue any official conclusions as to the aircraft’s flight path until a high amount of certainty and verification is achieved. However all ongoing search operations are at the moment being conducted to cover all possible areas where the aircraft could have gone down in order to ensure no possibility is overlooked.

6. In addition, I would like to state to the media that all information and developments will be released via official statements and press conferences as soon as possible and when appropriate. Our current efforts are focused upon on finding the aircraft as soon as possible.

Thank You

GENERAL TAN SRI DATO’SRI RODZALI BIN DAUD RMAF

Chief of Royal Malaysian Air Force

Released On:

11 March 14 Kuala Lumpur

Mega orders at the Dubai Air Show!

11/17/2013

 
Picture
An Emirates Airline Boeing 777-300ER on final approach to Guangzhou Baiyun Airport: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Dubai-based Emirates Airline placed an order for 150 of Boeing's new 777 mini-jumbos (nicknamed 777-X), in a $76bn (£47bn) deal at the 2013 Dubai Air Show. These will be a combination of 35 Boeing 777-8Xs and 115 Boeing 777-9Xs; plus 50 purchase rights. It is the single largest aircraft order by value in the history of US commercial aviation, creating and supporting an estimated 436,000 jobs in the US. Emirates currently operates 131 Boeing 777s and has a further 214 Boeing 777s on order. The 777-X, which has FOLD-UP carbon fibre wing tips will be delivered in 2020 (without the bendy wings, the wingspan is about the same as the Airbus A380). 

Emirates has also ordered FIFTY Airbus A380s, in a deal worth $23 billion. The airline is already the biggest customer of the A380. 

So where will they be parked? Dubai is a tiny place, and indeed, so is it’s airport. The answer is going to be ‘Dubai World Central - Al Maktoum International Airport’. The airport is  planned to become the world's largest passenger and cargo hub, ten times larger than the current Dubai International Airport which covers an area of 29 square kilometres (7,200 acres) and Dubai Cargo Village combined. One terminal is going to be for ALL THE OTHER AIRLINES except Emirates (& Qantas Airways two daily appearances). The latter two will enjoy having Terminals A, B & C to themselves. When they move to DXB World - it'll be in one hit, in about 2020 - when the first 777-X arrives.

Meanwhile, all the freight aircraft and the VIP aircraft will be sent to DXB World before the runway works next year (DXB World is going to have FIVE runways). So, now you know where they’re gonna park the 140 A380s, 150 777xs, 100 777s and 70 A350s as from 2020.

While the aviation industry is suffering financially in the Americas and Europe, it is booming in the Asia Pacific and Middle Eastern regions. Huge airport construction projects are well under way in cities such as Shenzhen (new airport terminal will open on 28th November), Doha, Dubai, Mumbai, Delhi, Kunming, and many others (mostly in China and the Middle East).
Picture
The Dubai Airshow was opened by HRH Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid al-Maktoum of Dubai (left of photo in gold robes): Photo Copyright Getty Images

A Powerboat challenges a Boeing 747-8i in Hong Kong

8/26/2013

 
On final approach into Hong Kong International Airport's runway 25 right, our brand new Boeing 747-8i had just passed Tin Liu Village (Ma Wan Park) and Tai Lung when we were challenged head on by a powerboat (as seen in the photo below). The giant whale's landing speed of around 160 knots (184mph) was just a bit too much for the poor soul (who must have been going at around 90 mph).
Picture
Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Tsing Ma Bridge, Hong Kong: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Ready for action...another long haul flight. This time on-board the Boeing 747-8i - longest aircraft in the world.

8/25/2013

 
At 76.25 meters, the Boeing 747-8 is officially the world's longest aircraft (cargo or passenger usage). It can accommodate a maximum of 605 passengers (in an all economy class configuration), or around 400 passengers (in a 3 or 4 class configuration). The freighter version of the aircraft has a cargo capacity of 30,177 cu ft (854.5 m3). 53 aircraft are currently in service, with 36 of those being freighter versions. Currently, Lufthansa German Airlines is the ONLY two airline that operates the passenger version with 9 aircraft in active service, and a further 10 on order. It was a pleasure to be on this rare gem, nick-named the 'Queen of the Skies'. There is talk that the current Boeing 747 aircraft used by the President of the United States of America, nick-named Air Force One, will be replaced with the Boeing 747-8i in the near future.

The aircraft I flew on today entered service on the 26th of July 2013 (aircraft Reg: D-ABYK), and this was it's 5th flight since entering service with Lufthansa. No wonder why the interior had a smell like that of a brand new Mercedes car! 
Picture
The Boeing 747-8i, the world's longest aircraft: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Preparing some paperwork for the long-haul flight to Hong Kong. Photo taken from Jumseat. Note the airport departure hall in the background: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Opps...someone's dropped their apple juice next to the jumpseat!: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Capture the moment! 'Lufthansa 796 heavy, you are cleared for take-off runway 07 C!': Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Need for speed...night time view of Frankfurt Main Airport as we rotate from the runway: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Frankfurt Main - Germany's hub to the world

8/24/2013

 
While most of the legacy European airlines (BA, Air France, KLM, Iberia, Alitalia, TAP, SAS, Finnair, and Aer Lingus), are going through an 'economic sufferage', Germany's national flag carrier, Lufthansa German Airlines, can be proud that it is one of the few airline companies in the Western hemisphere that is doing well. News earlier in London that the new UK Government is thinking of scrapping plans for the third runway at Heathrow, the world's busiest international airport, will have wide repercussions for airline manufacturer Boeing, who have bet on the 'more flights more often' mantra in developing the 250-330 passenger 787 Dreamliner. 

With no ability to increase aircraft movements the prize must go to Airbus who bet on the 526 seat Airbus A380-800 (nicknamed the 'Super Jumbo'). Lufthansa was the 2nd European airline to operate the A380, and has 10 aircraft currently in service operating on high density routes such as Beijing, Johannesburg, and Tokyo. 

On December 6, 2006, Lufthansa placed an order for 20 Boeing 747-8I airliners (the longest aircraft in the world), becoming the launch customer of the type. The airline currently has 9 aircraft in service, each with 386 seats; and has a further 10 on order. I had a chance to fly on this relatively brand new aircraft (which first flew on June 1st 2012). Lufthansa is the only airline that currently flies the passenger version of the Boeing 747-8i. Korean Airlines, Air China, and Arik Air have placed some orders for passenger version of this aircraft.
Picture
One of the busiest airports in Europe- Frankfurt Main International: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Airbus A380-800 - largest passenger aircraft in the world: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
The Boeing 747-8i- longest aircraft in the world: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh

Egyptair B777-300ER lands at Heathrow

8/22/2013

 
Picture
An Egyptair Boeing 777-300ER lands at Heathrow's Runway 27R: photo Copyright Navjot Singh
The sight of a Egyptair Boeing 777-300ER landing at Heathrow's Runway 27R caught my eye as I made my way in order to catch my flight. Despite the serious civil unrest and chaos that the country is going through, the airline is still flying normal schedules without any issues. Egypt's sea resorts, especially Sharm el-Sheikh and Hurghada, are popular holiday destinations for many Europeans (July and August are the hottest months of the year at Sharm el-Sheikh, and become a beehive for avid scuba divers). The pristine waters of the Red Sea (it's actually turquoise), the year around sunshine, the great Egyptian hospitality and the delicious food all are key reasons why so many Europeans escape their boring and dull lands in search of sun, sea, and sand. 

The land of the people who were one of the first major civilizations to codify design elements in art and architecture is going through a tough time at the moment. While there may be enhanced security in places such as Sharm el-Sheikh and Hurghada (where I guess most of the passengers in the plane above would have come from), the country is going through a phase of continued unrest and the evolving political situation.

In Cairo on the 14th of August Egyptian security forces ended sit-in protests at Nahda Square close to Cairo University in Giza and at Rabaa Al-Adaweya mosque in Nasr City. This resulted in at least 500 deaths. Violent clashes also occurred near Mostafa Mahmoud Square in Mohandiseen, Cairo. It’s very likely that there will be further protests in Cairo- and let's hope that 

Face-to-face with the 'Queen of the Skies'...

7/25/2013

 
Picture
A Boeing 747-400 belonging to British Airways parked at the Heathrow maintenance hanger near the Eastern Perimeter Road: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
The veteran Australian author and broadcaster, Clive James described the Boeing 747 as being (I quote): 'Like a winged supertanker full of odoriferous amethystine ordure', and 'a colossal machine'. His words echoed in my mind as I came face-to-face with this beauty on a hot summer's day at Heathrow International Airport. 

Aviation is bringing along many gems in the sky, especially with the Boeing 787 'Dreamliner', the Airbus A380-800, and the Airbus A350-900XWB; but nothing will ever beat the imposing beauty of the original 'Queen of the Skies', the Boeing 747 (AKA, the REAL Jumbo Jet).

Asiana Airlines Boeing 777-200ER crash lands at SFO

7/10/2013

 
Picture
On the morning of the 6th of July 2013 just past 11.28am local time, a Boeing 777-200ER belonging to South Korea's Asiana Airlines (flight number OZ214) carrying 307 passengers and crew, crash landed while on approach onto San Francisco International Airport's Runway 28L.

Whenever a plane crash happens, second guessing and pure rumors or any other speculation does no good and is of no value to anyone - even to professional journalists who work for Broadsheets - trust me on that one!. It can be extremely irritating (and distressing for passengers relatives), when people on the likes of Twitter, Facebook, PPRune, Airliners.net, Jetphotos.net and Fox News' etc. go about with their so called 'aviation experts', spewing historical events and their own takes on what could have gone wrong. I prefer to wait until either the wreckage is examined/investigation in complete or the NTSB is notified. It's one of the reasons that I don't turn on the TV at these times but rely on concrete factual information for journalists from informed media such as FT.com and the BBC.

The weather was reported as very good; the latest METAR reported light wind, 10 miles (16 km) visibility, with no precipitation, and no forecast or reports of wind shear. The pilots performed a visual approach assisted by the runway's precision approach path indicator (PAPI).

The landing gear and then the tail struck the seawall that projects into San Francisco Bay. Both engines and the tail section separated from the aircraft. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) noted that the main landing gear, the first part of the aircraft to hit the seawall, "separated cleanly from [the] aircraft as designed". The vertical and both horizontal stabilizers fell on the runway before the threshold.

The remainder of the fuselage and wings rotated (yawed) counter-clockwise 330 degrees as it slid westward. Video showed it pivoting about a wing and the nose while sharply inclined to the ground. It came to rest to the left of the runway, 2,400 feet (730 m) from the initial point of impact at the seawall. 

Out of the 291 passengers and 16 crew, sadly 3 passengers died, and 181 passengers suffered serious but non-fatal injuries. Out of the three who lost their lives, two were named as Ms. Ye Mengyuan and Ms. Wang Linjia, both Chinese nationals, and both 16-year-old middle school students from China's eastern Zhejiang province. They were seated at the rear of the plane and their bodies were found on the tarmac. The third passenger died of her injuries several days later at hospital. At the request of her immediate family, her name and the extent of her injuries were not published. Among the injured were three flight attendants who were thrown onto the runway while still strapped in their seats when the tail section broke off after striking the seawall short of the runway.

Now, on that note a point about the photos of the crash and the relatives going around on Twitter etc. (especially the UK Daily Mail, and other tabloids), that can be so ridiculous. OK, photographers may have to get pics of the grieving families to keep their Editors happy ..BUT I don't want to OR have to look at them. It's just sick. RIP to those who have died. You can tell when the stupidity at The UK Daily Mail has reached new heights when they write false stories in order to get their readership high. The Editor has been trying to pretend that his rag is NOT a tabloid (heaven forbid) by spilling stories over the gutter in an effort to win a design competition at his local school. He should give up & just use the tabloid tricks that were developed by experts.

The Boeing 777, like ALL American built aircraft (except the 787 Deamliner - now dubbed the 'nightmareliner' because of its high number of faults) is a very reliable and strong aircraft- the Boeing 777s are the aviation's equivalent of the John Deer Tractor, you can throw anything at them and not a single whisker in sight will damage them. 

This was the Boeing 777's first fatal accident, and second crash (previous: British Airways Flight 38 in 2008), and third hull loss since the Boeing 777 began operating commercially in 1995.

It's a well known fact in the industry that around 95% of aircraft crashes happen 8 nautical miles either side of the airport below 3000 feet. 95% of aircraft fires happen in the first two hours. The fix is, when realizing it is uncontrollable, dive for the ground before the wing burns through. Record aloft is below 25 mins.
Picture
Asiana Airlines Boeing 777-200ER at SFO: Photo Copyright Amar Salehi
Picture
Asiana Airlines Boeing 777-200ER at SFO: Photo Copyright Bill Nelson
Below is video animation showing the comparison between the actual flight path taken by flight OZ214 into San Francisco's Runway 28L, and what the correct flight path should have looked like. 

The video is a testament to a brilliantly-built aircraft; designed and modelled entirely on computers in the early 1990s. The video shows what happens if you can use the fuselage to dissipate the energy, then the landing gear and the engines shear off at extreme speed, as designed. Unlike steel, aluminium doesn't produce sparks like steel does.

An experienced Airline pilot with over 28 years in the cockpit, who did not wish to be named, told me (I quote):

'It's long been the Airbus philosophy that "if the aircraft is not doing what you want (for ANY reason) disconnect the automatics and fly it manually at once". That works well in airlines where you have a wealth of basic Visual Flight Rules (VFR) flying skills to fall-back on. Sadly, with the death of general aviation around the world, there are many countries where pilots don't have that background. It's why Airbus has increased the endorsement program from 9 simulators to 13. Airbus now teaches people to fly each model visually with all systems working normally (especially after what happened with the Air France 447 crash). Who would have thought it would come to this? Many of us. Predicting that, one day, each pilot would have to pass a test of knowledge to survive. At Aviation Theory Centre in the early 90s I ran a series of lectures explaining that our books taught "To Pass The Test - Not Just The Exam". Sadly most theory centres just teach the syllabus and no more.'

Another airline pilot gave me this account of an aircraft coming in too LOW into Dubai Airport a few days after the Asiana Airlines crash happened (I won't name the pilot who gave me this credible report):

'Blood ran cold today. 28 years of flying and never heard this from an APProach controller: 

APP: "XXXXX (an indian carrier) Are you too low? I have you at 800 feet!" [now, he usually transfers to TWR at about 5 miles (1500 feet) so there is no reason to be at that level on Approach.]

XXXX: after long silence "XXXX going around" 

APP: "XXXX are you climbing? I still have you below radar lowest safe!" 

XXXX: " We are climbing through 1,500, can we make a visual circuit?" (this is how Gulf Air crashed an A320 and the clever controller decided to take it out of his hands...)

APP: "Climb to 4000 feet and make left turn to 030." (Thereby saving the day, he never even answered the query for a visual approach.)

How, you ask? Well the QNH was 994mb and 500 feet lower than the std of 1013. Setting the altimeter from high (1013) to a low number winds OFF altitude. Old Pilots say: "High to Low LOOKOUT below!" I bet the XXXX boys still had 1013mb set
'.
'
The below presentation, ('Children of Magenta'), provides a wealth of experience and advice for pilots of new-generation airliners (especially 787, A380, and A350). When in doubt: Disconnect automation, fall back on your flying skills and FLY THE AIRCRAFT. 

HOWEVER, the problem is: what if you a crew who have no experience in hand-flying aircraft, no raw flying experience to fall back-on (as those Asiana 214, and Air France 447 pilots)? 

One of my mates, an experienced Captain for Emirates, says: 'Always make sure YOU are flying the aeroplane, and that IT'S not flying you. Sadly, this brilliant instructor has passed away. He'd be rolling in his grave if he knew that there are thousands of pilots currently flying airliners who have never had such a background.'.

Flying is not the same as it just to be back in the 1980s and even early 1990s- it's not as glamorous as it used to be...and even more importantly safety is plummeting these days. Did you know Singapore have fired ALL their expats since this accident at SFO? The week before this Asiana crash, a Singapore Airlines B777 did a go around on the same runway after doing the exact same thing…with a 777 full of passengers. That - in the 90s - would have been inconceivable!.

When you have 300 passengers behind you, there is no room for failure, and it's dangerous to just depend on the Autopilot. No doubt, the Asiana Airlines crew were invited for a not-so polite chat over a tea session in Washington...no biscuits though.  
Picture

A plane crashes...for all to see on the internet (sad)

4/30/2013

 
On the 29th of April 2013, a National Air Cargo Boeing 747-400 freighter on behalf of US Mobility Command, registration N949CA performing cargo flight N8-102 from Bagram (Afghanistan) to Dubai Al Maktoum (United Arab Emirates) with 7 crew and cargo consisting of 5 military vehicles, crashed shortly after takeoff from Bagram Air Base's runway 03 at 15:30 local time, and erupted into flames near the end of the runway within the perimeter of the Air Base. All 7 crew died in the accident.

National Air Cargo confirmed their aircraft N949CA with 7 crew, 4 pilots, 2 mechanics and a load master - initial information had been 8 crew -crashed at Bagram. The airline later added, that the aircraft had been loaded with all cargo in Camp Bastion (Afghanistan, about 300nm southwest of Bagram), the cargo had been inspected at Camp Bastion, the aircraft subsequently positioned to Bagram for a refuelling stop with no difficulty, no cargo was added or removed, however, the cargo was again inspected before the aircraft departed for the leg to Dubai Al Maktoum.

A horrifying dashcam video captured the full extent of the crash with the Boeing 747-400F appearing to take off normally as it gained altitude, and then plunging into the ground like a rock. It’s the kind of stuff you may see in a nightmare. The video went viral on the internet and elsewhere (except it was not shown by some respected media outlets). There was a time in history when such things were NOT shown by the media. 

At the time the news broke out of the crash I was in Detroit, (Michigan), home state to six of the crew members who died. Interestingly enough on that day I was on the phone to a very good friend of mine who personally knew the deceased Captain of that unfortunate flight. Captain Rajan, former of Pan-Am and a veteran Boeing 747-400 training Captain with Boeing, told me of his utter shock and disbelief that the video of the crash was freely available on the internet. 

It’s a sad change of the times indeed that with all the modern technology and social media there is nothing that cannot be sold by anyone (and they don’t have to be journalist in order to do so). In my opinion, such videos should not be on the internet or elsewhere as a mark of respect for the deceased. Yes, there are lots of unmentionable and horrific videos on the internet, however normally such things are not shown by the media. It’s not a Hollywood movie...it’s totally disrespectful to those who died to show that video (In my opinion).

Turkish Airlines at Gatwick, and Emirates at Heathrow!

4/14/2013

 
Picture
A model plane of a Turkish Airlines Boeing 777-300ER at Gatwick Airport: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
A model plane of an Emirates Airlines Airbus A380-800 at Heathrow Airport. Concorde used to be here before: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
A model plane of an Emirates Airlines Airbus A380-800 at Heathrow Airport. Concorde used to be here before: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
When passengers arrive or depart from London's two major international airports, Heathrow and Gatwick, they will notice that the aircraft models that are displayed as welcoming adverts are in fact not representative of any of the British airlines.

On the 30th of March 2007, a scale model of Concorde which had the pride of place at Heathrow Airport's entrance for 16 years was sadly removed, and replaced in 2008 with an Emirates Airlines A380 aircraft model. British Airways had decided not to renew the £1.5m annual rent to advertise on the roundabout at the gateway to the London airport. Instead, Emirates Airlines, the major carrier of the United Arab Emirates, poached the prime spot with a six-year deal to advertise on the site.

Meanwhile at Gatwick Airport, Turkish Airlines have partnered with Eye and Gatwick Airport to suspend a scale model aeroplane inside the airport terminal. The Boeing 777-300ER aircraft, situated in Gatwick’s North Terminal check-in measures 6.1m in length with a wingspan of 5.1m. The 124kg structure created by Leading Models will be suspended from the check-in ceiling until August 2013.

Back in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s the airport billboards at British Airports were thronged with national pride such as BOAC, British Caledonian (remember them?!), British Midland, Virgin and so on. With the change of the times, it's the Middle Eastern and Asian carriers who seem to have the money (China Southern Airlines have huge billboards outside Terminal 4 at Heathrow). So the question is if there any chance that we may ever see British carriers advertising their airlines at British airports?

Communication between Pilots and ATC in China

4/11/2012

 
Picture
Cockpit of a Boeing 737-800NG aircraft belonging to Air China: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Captain Bill Johnson prepares his Boeing 777-300ER aircraft for departure at Guangzhou Baiyun Airport: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
I have had a few people asking me the question: How do pilots and ATC communicate over Chinese airspace? The answer is: In aviation English (which I will give an example of at the end of this blog article). 

It is nothing new that most pilots operating on Chinese airlines cannot (with all due respect), speak good enough English (or none whatsoever in some cases). It would be true that the current and the future generation of Chinese pilots that are trained in Australia or the U.S.A. can converse in English, but those who are trained in China may not be able to converse in English (especially veteran pilots). The same goes for airline and military pilots from Japan, Korea, Russia, and other countries where English may not be widely used even as a second language. Having spoken to a few airline pilots from various international airlines such as Turkish Airlines, Qatar Airways, British Airways, and Emirates, the problems come about when pilots whose first language is English are trying to work out what is going on when they listen to the Air Traffic Controllers (ATC) transmissions over the airwaves. It certainly does not help if the local ATC and local pilots are communicating in Chinese rather than the international aviation language (i.e. English).

Captain Bill Johnson, who flies the Boeing 777-300ER says though the problem is a global one, it can be more problematic over Chinese airspace because of the seriousness of the language issues. 'When we are flying over Chinese airspace, more times than one we have to repeat everything to make sure that the Chinese ATC and other aircraft in the immediate airspace can understand what we are saying,' said Captain Johnson who has over 20 years flying experience.

‘The main difference between flying over China or Russia, and other parts of the world is that the measurements used by Chinese and Russian ATC and pilots are in meters. The metric altitudes translate into feet, and most airlines give pilots a conversion table. The metric altitudes translate into feet, and most airlines give pilots a conversion table,’ said Captain Johnson.

Captain Syed Abdul Aziz A. Rahman who flies the Airbus A340, told me that the Chinese and Russians have devised their own meters to feet conversion tables, which can be problematic if you have never flown into Russia or China. "Basically they have assumed that 300 meters = 1000 feet. Airlines have to then change it to their own specific standard operating procedure. The First Officer (or the Pilot not flying is most cases) reads the metric equivalent  in feet which is then inputted into the FMS and altitude window by the Captain (or the Pilot who is flying) who also checks the ECAM ( Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitor) screen for agreement on both sides. The procedure, which takes around 5 minutes, finishes by both pilots agreeing visually and verbally," said Captain Rahman, a veteran with over 22 years flying experience. The checking procedure at the end is so important because otherwise pilots can have problems when flying over international airspace.

I fondly recall sitting in the jumpseat of a China Southern Airlines Boeing 757 from Guangzhou to Sanya where the captain hardly spoke a single word of English. He spoke some aviation language such as 'Standby', 'Affirmative', 'OK, China Southern 6748 climb to flight level 350'. But to my surprise some of the most important instructions were in Chinese, such as 'Cleared for take-off', 'Cleared to land', 'V1.....V2...Rotate' were all in Chinese! His English, with all due respect, was so limited that instead of telling me to wait he shouted aviation terms 'standby....standby!'. On that particular occasion even the First Officer could not communicate in normal English.

Captain Sheetal Rajan, a senior training Captain on the Boeing 747-400 with the Boeing company and CEO of 'Air Safety Equipment', says that even though the minimum required international standard for English is IACO Level 4 (which is equivalent to Level B1 of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR)), he is still surprised that some pilots in places such as China and Russia tend to have a lower level of English than the international required standard. ‘I suppose they may just rely on using aviation English,’ says Captain Rajan.

Because of the amount of traffic in the skies and the quick turnaround time needed at airports for take-offs and landings, the vast majority of ATC around the world speak quickly (a crude example is the ATC at London Heathrow where a plane lands or take-offs EVERY 50 seconds or so!). In busy airspaces such as India and China it is no exception. Even a one minute delay in the aviation industry can end up costing hundreds of dollars, so ATC are always under pressure to make sure that planes get from A to B as safely and quickly as possible. With this in mind most of the ATCs whose first language is not English (i.e. Indians, Chinese, Thai, Russians etc.) tend to speak quickly to the pilots. However to eliminate confusion they have to repeat it twice over so that the pilots can understand what they are going on about. Unless, of course, there is not that much traffic around so then ATC can speak as clearly and slowly as possible (which is rare around busy airports such as Shanghai Pudong, Beijing etc.).

The skies over China can get ridiculously busy, and with the aviation industry seeing a fast growth in the country, it would only be time when Chinese pilots will need to start speaking fluent English.

Examples of aviation language:

Standby = please wait
Retard = Its an autothrottle callout during flare to retard the thrust levers (normally you hear the FMS say this 3 times….’Retard, retard, retard’)
Affirmative = OK,I understand
Flight Level 350 = 35,000 feet (similarly Flight Level 360 = 36,000 feet and so on)
Cleared for take-off/Cleared to land (easy to understand!)
Climb Up/Descend (easy to understand!)
Turn right heading 180 degrees/Turn left heading 180 degrees etc.
Speed back to 170knots (or 180 knots etc.)
The alphabet from A-Z is standard as with the police/fire/ambulance services (A= Alpha, B = Bravo, C= Charlie, D= Delta, E= Echo, F= Foxtrot, G= Golf, H= Hotel, I= India, J= Juliet, K= Kilo, L= Lima, M= Mike, N= November, O= Oscar, P= Papa, Q= Quebec, R= Romeo, S=Sierra, T=Tango, U=Uniform, V=Victor, W=Whiskey, X=X-ray, Y= Yankee, Z=Zulu !!)
Picture
The conversion charts (yellow with black excel table) can be seen available for pilots to easily convert the feet and meters: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
A close up of a height conversion chart displayed on the throttles of this A320 aircraft: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
Picture
Turkish Airlines Boeing 777-300ER in-flight capture (flying somewhere over western China). Notice the stars visible through the windows..: Photo Copyright Navjot Singh
<<Previous

    RSS Feed

    Get in Touch:

    LIFE MATTERS

    Here I share my thoughts
    and experiences during
    my travels, and how some things have affected my life as an expat and world traveller. Travelling is about capturing that moment in life. Every word, view and opinion on this page is that of Navjot Singh - except where indicated. The most recent is at the top. Scroll down to read the archive. Or search using CTRL+F (COMMAND + F) and enter a keyword to search the page. Just some of the stories you never heard before.

    The NAVJOT-SINGH.COM web blog is separate to this web site....Click blog, which may 
    not be visible in some
    countries due to local
    firewall restrictions,
    so in those cases this
    weblog may be read. The weblog also includes some of my press trip reports- most of which are not published on the official blog because of copyright issues. The weblog also contains articles that may be associated directly with a PR trip for a country, airline or a hotel. These are PR reviews done in relations with various companies.

    If you are an investor or a trend watcher then you may find this website useful as investing has a lot to do with personal observations and finding the ideal trend or next big thing. The average human on the street frequently knows far more about the state of the economy than politicians, university professors, subject matter experts, and financial analysts who seldom travel, or if they do so, only from one hotel to another hotel! The pulse and vibrancy of an economy is nowhere more visible than on a country's streets.
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    All photos and words
    are © Navjot Singh unless stated. Photos taken by others or by agencies are appropriately copyrighted under the respective name. No photo or word/s may be taken without the prior written permission by the author (i.e. Navjot Singh). All Rights Reserved.


    qr code
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Navjot being interviewed by Cecila Lu at GDTV.
    Navjot Singh (雷辛格)

    Archives

    September 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    October 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    October 2020
    January 2019
    October 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    November 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    April 2007
    August 2006

    Categories

    All
    10 Yuan Shop
    9/11
    AA Gill
    Abu Dhabi
    Abu Hamza
    Acqua Restaurant
    Aerogulf
    Afghanistan
    Airbus
    Airbus A350 Xwb
    Airbus A380
    Air Canada
    Air China
    Aircraft Safety
    Air Force One
    Air Force Two
    Air India
    Airline
    Air Malta
    Airport
    Air Travel
    Alibaba.com
    Alibaba Group
    Alitalia
    Allders
    Altanitis
    A Luxury Collection Resort
    American Airlines
    Ami Vashi
    Amsterdam
    Andrew Reich
    Angelo's Bar
    Antarctic Odyssey - A New Beginning
    Apm Line
    Apple Corporation
    Arc De Triomphe
    Art Museum Of Xian Qu Jiang82514c41ff
    Asiana Airlines 214
    At.mosphere Burj Khalifa
    Au Baroudeur
    Autumn
    Aviation
    Azure
    Babar Ahmad
    Baby Milk
    Badaling
    Baftas-2014
    Bagram-747-crash
    Bai Yun Restaurant
    Bananas
    Bandar Abbas
    Bangkok
    Banyan Tree Hangzhou
    Banyan Tree Sanya
    Bbc
    BBC Countryfile
    Beach Life
    Beijing
    Beijing-2008-olympics
    Beijing Jianbing (北京煎饼)
    Beijing Pollution
    Beijing-wall
    Beiyuan Restaurant
    Belfast
    Belgium
    Belle-Vue Restaurant
    Biggin Hill
    Birmingham
    Blue Rain Restaurant Ritzcarlton Difc Dubai8a09ec5785
    Boeing
    Boeing 737 MAX
    Boeing 747 400
    Boeing 747-400
    Boeing 777200
    Boeing 777 200
    Boeing 777 300
    Boeing 777-300
    Boeing 777X
    Boeing 787 8i
    Boeing 7878i451ed64e71
    Bologna
    Bologna Airport
    Bonnington-cafe
    Boracay
    Borough Market
    Bournemouth
    Breakfast
    Brexit
    Britain
    British Airspace
    British Airways
    Brixton
    Brockwell Park
    Brunswick-house
    Brussels
    Buckingham Palace
    Bund
    Business Travellers Handbook To China
    Cairo
    Cake Shop
    Camel
    Canada
    Canary Wharf
    Cannes
    Cannes Lions 2016
    Canon 5D Mark III
    Canterbury
    Cantonese Food
    Cape Town
    Cathay Pacific Airways
    Cctv
    Cebu Pacific Airlines
    Central
    Central London
    Chaiwan
    Champs Elysees8c6d4d0aea
    Chef Justin Quek
    Chengdu
    Chernobyl
    Chikan
    China
    China Aviation Museum
    China Daily
    China Lodge
    China Plus
    China Southern Airlines
    Chinatown
    Chinatown Singapore
    Chinese
    Chinese Airspace
    Chinese Chess
    Chinese Food
    Chinese New Year
    Chinese TV
    Chinese Wedding
    Chinghe Huang7d3dd24339
    Chinglish
    Chongqing
    Chris Hadfield
    Christmas
    Citm
    City Of Dreams
    City Of London
    Cloud 9 Restaurant
    Club Europe
    Coconut Juice
    Concorde
    Construction
    Cosmetic Surgery
    Cote Brasserie
    Covent Garden
    COVID 19 Pandemic
    COVID-19 Pandemic
    Croatia
    Croydon
    Ctw
    Cuandixia Villege
    Cultures
    Cumulonimbus
    Cycling
    Deng Xiao Ping
    Desert
    Detroit
    Dimsum
    Disneyland Hong Kong
    Diving
    DJI
    Doha
    Donald Trump
    Downstairs With David Laris
    Dragon Boat Festival
    Dr John Marr38a1f5b428
    Drones
    Dubai
    Dubai Aquarium
    Dulwich
    Dulwich College
    Dunsfold Aerodrome
    Durban
    Durdle Door
    Easter
    Ebike62b9048548
    Economy
    Edinburgh
    Education
    Eff
    Egypt
    Egyptair
    Eiffel Tower
    Elba At The St Regis Shenzhen
    Emirates
    England
    English Words
    E-taxi China
    Etihad Airways
    Euro 2016
    Europe
    Expat
    Expo 2010
    Expo 2010
    Face Whitening Cream
    Falcon
    Family
    Farnborough Airshow
    Fauja Singh
    Felix Baumgartner
    Felix Restaurant
    Ferrari World
    Fifa
    Financial Research Industry
    First Class
    Flair Restaurant
    Florence
    Flying
    Food Critic
    Football
    Formula 1
    Fortune Tellers
    France
    Frankfurt
    French
    French Food
    Fujian Province
    Fuli Village
    Funchal
    Gabriella Guglielminotti Trivel
    Gallery Suites Shanghai
    Garden Hotel Guangzhou
    GDTV
    Geneva
    Geneva Auto Show
    German Art
    Germany
    Gideon's Children
    Global News Toronto
    Glo Restaurant + Bar
    Google
    Grand Hotel Des Arts
    Grand Hyatt
    Grand Hyatt Erawan
    Grand Hyatt Guangzhou
    Grand Hyatt Hong Kong
    Grand Hyatt Macau
    Grand Hyatt Seoul
    Grand Hyatt Shenzhen
    Grand Hyatt Singapore
    Grand Kempinski Shanghai
    Gran Melia Shanghai
    Great Wall Of China
    Greg Balazic
    G Restaurant
    Grissini
    Guangdong
    Guangfu
    Guangzhou
    Guangzhou Airport
    Guantanamo Bay
    Gui Hua Lou
    Guilin
    Guiyang
    Haagen-Dazs
    Hairy Crab
    Haiti
    Hangzhou
    Happy New Year 2012
    Harry Redknapp
    Hays Galleria
    Heathrow
    Helen Amelia Thomas
    Helicopter
    Herbal Tea
    Herne Hill
    History
    Ho Chi Minh City
    Holidays
    Holland
    Hong Kong
    Hong Kong Airport
    Hong Mei
    Hotel Bonaparte
    Hotel Clover Of The Arts
    Hotel Corona D'Oro 1890 Bologna
    Hotel De Edge
    Hotel Lkf
    Hotel Panorama By Rhombus
    Hotel Pennington
    Hotel Yak & Yeti Kathmandu
    Hot Weather
    House Of Dancing Water
    House Prices China
    Howard G Franklin
    Hrh Duke And Duchess Of Cambridge
    Huang Ting
    Hunan Province
    Hyatt On The Bund
    Hyatt Regency Kathmandu
    Hyde Park
    Iberia Airlines
    IL-76
    India
    Intercontinental Shenzhen
    International Photography Awards
    Iran
    Islam
    Istanbul
    It
    Italian Food
    Italy
    IT&CMA
    IT&CMA
    James Nixon
    Japanese Food
    Jennifer Palisoc
    Jia Hong Kong
    Jiangmen
    Jia Shanghai
    Jinan
    Jing An Temple
    Jinkeng Dazhai Longji Rice Terraces
    Jin Xuan
    Jiuzhaigou
    Johannesburg
    Journalist
    Jumeirah Himalaya Hotel In Shanghai
    Jw Marriott Beijing
    Kaçkar Mountains
    Kaiane Aldorino
    Kaiping
    Kai Tak
    Katharina Fritsch
    Kathmandu
    Kempinski Beijing
    Kempinski Shenzhen
    Kerry Hotel Beijing
    Kerry Hotel Shanghai
    Kong Dongmei
    Korean Cafes
    Korean Ginseng
    Kowloon City
    Kuala Lumpur
    Kunming
    La Defense
    Lai Heen
    Lake Garda
    Lakshadweep Islands
    Lamborghini
    Langkawi
    Lan Kwai Fong
    Lausanne
    Les 110 De Taillevent
    Le Sheng Restaurant
    Li River Cruise
    Liverpool
    Lizhiwan
    Loch Fyne
    London
    London 2012 Olympics
    London Bus
    London City Airport
    London Evening Standard
    London Marathon 2014
    London New Year Fireworks
    London Tube Strike
    Lonnie Hodge
    Loughborough
    Lufthansa
    Lunar Eclipse December 2011
    Luxembourg
    Luzhi
    Macau
    Madeira
    Madrid
    Maglev
    Malayia
    Malaysia
    Malaysia Airlines
    Malaysia Airlines MH370
    Malta
    Manila
    Mansion House Boutique Hotel
    Mao Zedong
    Marathon
    Margaret Thatcher
    Marina Bay Sands
    Mayor Of London
    Media
    Mews Of Mayfair
    Mezza9 Restaurant
    Mg
    Mice
    Michael Palin Cbe
    Michael Wood
    Mid Autumn Festival
    Mid-Autumn Festival
    Millennium Bridge
    Miss India
    Miss World
    Miss World 2003
    Mo Farah
    Money
    Mongolia
    Moon
    Moon Cakes
    Moon Hill
    Mount Blanc
    Mount Everest
    Mt. Etna
    Mudu
    Muscat
    Mutianyu
    Nanjing
    Nanshan
    Nanxiang
    Nasa
    Navjot Singh
    Navjot Singh Sidhu
    Nazi
    Nehru Centre
    Nelson Mandela
    Nepal
    Nepal Earthquake
    Newcastle
    New Delhi
    New Year 2016
    Niagara Falls
    Night Time
    Nihao
    Nizhny Novgorod
    Noise
    Northern Ireland
    Notre Dame
    Odd Signage China
    Olympics
    Oman
    Oman Air
    Opium Bar Madrid
    Pakistan
    Pakistan Air Force
    Paletto Restaurant
    Palladio
    Palm Jumeirah
    Panamie Cafe
    Panda Reserve
    Panyu
    Paracel Islands
    Paris
    Parisian Architecture
    Parisian Cafes
    Park Hyatt Beijing
    Park Hyatt Shanghai
    Peak
    Pearl River Delta
    Peninsula Bangkok
    Peninsula Beijing
    Peninsula Hong Kong
    Peninsula Hotel
    Peninsula Hotel Hong Kong
    Peninsula Shanghai
    Penthouse Restaurant
    Phantom Of The Opera
    Philippines
    Pilot Training
    Ping An Finance Centre
    Pink Moon
    Pocari Sweat
    Police
    Pollution
    Ponting Mountains
    Portugal
    Posh
    President Hu Jintao
    President Obama
    Pretoria
    Property In China
    Pudong Airport
    Qantas Airways
    Qatar
    Qatar Airways
    Qianmen
    Qibao
    Qingdao
    Qing Ming Festival
    Quality Control
    Queen Elizabeth
    Queen Elizabeth Ii Diamond Jubilee
    Quincy Hotel Singapore
    Racism
    Raffles Hotel Singapore
    Reflexions Restaurant
    Reuters
    Ribe Paris
    Rickshaw
    Ristorante Boccanegra
    Ristorante Da Giggetto
    Ritz Carlton Beijing (Financial Street)
    Ritz-Carlton Beijing (Financial Street)
    Ritz Carlton Guangzhou
    Ritz-Carlton Guangzhou
    Ritz Carlton Sanya
    Ritz-Carlton Sanya
    Ritz Carlton Shanghai Pudong
    Ritz Carlton Shenzhen
    Ritz-Carlton Shenzhen
    River Thames
    Rome
    Rotterdam
    Rover
    Royal Geographical Society
    Royal Selangor Club
    Rugby World Cup 2011
    Russia
    Saatchi
    Sadhu
    Sadiq Khan
    Sand
    San Francisco
    Sanya
    Scammers In China
    Scotland
    Seawings
    Seoul
    Shamian Island
    Shandong Province
    Shangchuan
    Shangdi
    Shanghai
    Shanghai Expo
    Shanghai Grand Hyatt
    Shangri La Beijing
    Shangri La Boracay
    Shangri La Pudong Shanghai
    Shangri-La Pudong Shanghai
    Shangri-La Shenzhen
    Shangri La Singapore
    Shangri-La Singapore
    Shard
    Sharjah
    Shenzhen
    Sheraton Guilin
    Sheraton Shenzhen (Futian)
    Sherpa Tenzing Norgay
    Shiraz
    Sichuan
    Sichuan Art Troupe
    Sicily
    Singapore
    Singapore Airlines
    Singapore Changi Airport
    Singapore Sling
    Sir Edmund Hillary
    Sirmione
    Skylife
    Sky On 57 Restaurant
    Slabs
    Snake Oil
    South Africa
    South China Sea
    South Korea
    Space
    Space Shuttle
    Spain
    Sri Lanka
    Sri Lankan Airlines
    Stacey Solomon
    Starbucks
    Steve Jobs
    Sticks'n'Sushi
    Stinky Tofu
    St. Paul's Cathedral
    St Regis Florence
    St Regis Shenzhen
    Super Blood Wolf Moon 2019
    Surinamese Broodjes
    Sushi
    Suzhou
    Swiss Alps
    Switzerland
    Tabriz Area
    Taishan
    Taiwan
    Taizhou
    Talha Ahsan
    TATE Modern
    Teemall Guangzhou
    Terracotta Warriors Of Xi'an
    Terrorism
    Tesco
    Thai
    Thailand
    The Andaman
    The Bronx
    The Challenger Sale
    The City Of Dreams
    The Garden Hotel Guangzhou
    The Marriott Resort And Spa
    The Marriott Resort And Spa Bangkok
    The Peninsula Bangkok (Thailand)
    The Pheasant Restauarnt- Heathrow
    The Portman Ritz Carlton Shanghai
    The Portman Ritz-Carlton Shanghai
    Theresa May
    The Ritz Carlton
    The Ritz Carlton Beijing
    The Ritz-Carlton Beijing
    The Ritz Carlton DIFC (DUBAI)
    The Ritz-Carlton DIFC (DUBAI)
    The Ritz Carlton Hong Kong
    The Ritz-Carlton Hong Kong
    The Ritz-Carlton Istanbul
    The Ritz Carlton Kuala Lumpur
    The Ritz Carlton Seoul
    The Ritz-Carlton Seoul
    The Secret Garden Of Eden
    The Sky Bridge Langkawi
    The World Travel Market
    Tianhe
    Tianjin
    Tianzifang
    Tibeten
    Tienanmen
    Tinamen Mountain
    Tom Carter
    Tongli
    Toronto
    Tower Bridge
    Trafalgar Square
    Tram
    Trattoria Al Bersagliere
    Trattoria Leonida Bologna
    Travel
    Trieste
    Tsim Sha Tsui
    Ttg Asia Media
    Turkey
    Turkish Airlines
    Typhoon Usagi
    Uae
    UK Daily Mail
    Uk Hacking Scandal
    UK Telegraph
    United Kingdom
    URBN Shanghai
    Usa
    US Military Base
    Valentines001476bdc2
    Verona
    Vietnam
    Waldorf Astoria Shanghai On The Bund
    Wanchai
    Wangfujing
    Warren Richardson
    Wei Jing Ge
    Wembley
    Wembley Stadium
    Wesley Klein
    Westin Excelsior Florence
    Westin Guangzhou
    Westin Xi'an
    Westminster
    Westminster Cathedral
    West Street
    Weymouth
    White House
    White Swan Hotel
    Windsor Castle
    Wolseley Restuarant
    World Cup 2010
    World Press Photo Contest 2015
    Wuhan
    Wuxi
    Xiachuan
    Xiamen
    Xian
    Xi'an North City Hotel
    Xiaoshan Island
    Xiaozhou
    Xi JinPing
    Xindalu Restaurant
    Xingli Restaurant
    Xingping
    Yangshuo
    Yangshuo Riverside Retreat
    Yangzhou
    YouTube Ads Leaderboard
    Yu Restaurant
    Zhangjiajie
    Zhouzhuang
    Zhujiang New Town
    Zoe Bradley
    Zongzi
    Zum Gemalten Haus
    Zurich
    毽子 - The Feather Puck

 Send me an email: navjot@navjot-singh.com

OR CONNECT WITH ME USING:

Design by Navjot Singh. All Rights Reserved 2002-2023

  • Home
  • Who am I?
  • 中文
  • Travel & Books
  • Photographs
  • Navjot's Blog
  • Airline PR
  • Portfolio
  • Terms & Conditions